NPR
Judge clears the way for Postal Service work on Trump's mail-in voting order for now
+278 words added -229 words removed
Accessibility links Skip to main content Keyboard shortcuts for audio player Open Navigation Menu --> Newsletters NPR Shop Get NPR+ Close Navigation Menu Home News Expand/collapse submenu for News National World Politics Business Health Science Climate Race Culture Expand/collapse submenu for Culture Books Movies Television Pop Culture Food Art & Design Performing Arts Life Kit Gaming Music Expand/collapse submenu for Music Tiny Desk New Music Friday All Songs Considered Music Features Live Sessions Podcasts & Shows Expand/collapse submenu for Podcasts & Shows Daily Morning Edition Weekend Edition Saturday Weekend Edition Sunday All Things Considered Up First Here & Now NPR Politics Podcast Featured Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me! Postal Service worker loads mail-in ballots onto a truck in 2022 in Miami. District Judge Indira Talwani on Thursday released a 14-day temporary restraining order against new requirements for states under the U.S. Postal Service's plan for carrying out Trump's directives. The judge is expected to decide whether to issue a longer-lasting block on USPS' plan after holding a Sept. 3 hearing.
Talwani has ruled multiple times in cases related to Trump's order. This latest one effectively reestablishes a nationwide block she had put on USPS' efforts for the order.
In Wednesday's order, the judge cited that reasoning by the Supreme Court for granting the administration's request to cancel her Aug. 11 nationwide ruling, which was also issued before USPS' Aug. 21 release of a final rule for federal ballot mail.
That rule's most controversial provision lays out a plan for delivering mail-in ballots only to people on lists of absentee voters that states would have to turn over to the mailing agency, as called for by Trump's order.
Elections A federal law bans late voter roll purges. Republicans are pushing to reinterpret it Trump, who himself has voted by mail in Florida, has said he signed this executive order in March to stop illegal voting by non-U.S. citizens, a problem that many studies and audits find is extremely rare.
The order's challengers argue that it oversteps a president's authority under the Constitution, which gives the power of setting federal election rules to the states and Congress. They also claim that USPS has no authority to control mail-in voting.
It remains unclear if and how Trump's directives would ultimately affect voting by mail for the midterms, which is set to start in a matter of weeks.
Trump's order is expected to face more legal hurdles as this lawsuit and other related cases filed by Democrats, voting rights groups and two dozen mainly Democratic-led states proceed.
Those challengers are asking Talwani, as well as another federal judge in Washington, D.C., to issue new rulings that would block USPS from carrying out its finalized plan and likely be appealed to the Supreme Court.
Editor's note: USPS is a financial supporter of NPR.
Edited by Benjamin Swasey
Politics Postal Service says its cash crisis is delayed until at least 2031, but problems loom NPR does not offer or accept money for coverage or interviews. Anyone who makes such an offer or request is not an NPR employee and does not represent NPR.
Sponsor Message
Become an NPR sponsor
− Fresh Air Wild Card with Rachel Martin It's Been a Minute Embedded Get NPR+ More Podcasts & Shows Search Newsletters NPR Shop Get NPR+ Tiny Desk New Music Friday All Songs Considered Music Features Live Sessions About NPR Diversity Support Careers Press Ethics Trump’s mail-in voting order faces new block on USPS plan A federal judge in Boston has temporarily blocked the U.S.
+ Fresh Air Wild Card with Rachel Martin It's Been a Minute Embedded Get NPR+ More Podcasts & Shows Search Newsletters NPR Shop Get NPR+ Tiny Desk New Music Friday All Songs Considered Music Features Live Sessions About NPR Diversity Support Careers Press Ethics USPS appeals block on plan for Trump’s mail-in voting order The U.S.
− Postal Service's finalized plan for President Trump's order to restrict mail-in voting for the midterms.
+ Postal Service appealed the court ruling blocking its plan for President Trump's order aimed at restricting mail-in voting for the midterm election, setting up a likely Supreme Court fight.
− The legal fight is far from over.
+ Elections Postal Service appeals order blocking plan for Trump's push to restrict mail voting Updated August 28, 20263:32 PM ET Originally published August 26, 20261:15 PM ET Hansi Lo Wang
A U.S.
− Elections Judge issues a new order blocking Postal Service's plan for Trump's mail voting order Updated August 27, 202610:05 PM ET Originally published August 26, 20261:15 PM ET Hansi Lo Wang
A U.S.
− Joe Raedle/Getty Images hide caption
U.S.
+ Joe Raedle/Getty Images hide caption
The Trump administration is appealing the latest major legal hurdle for the president's executive order that seeks to restrict mail-in voting for the midterm election.
The move sets the stage for the Supreme Court to once again consider Trump's order.
+ The justices will likely be asked to weigh in after the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reviews a ruling by a federal judge in Boston.
U.S.
− It sets the stage for another possible consideration of the executive order by the Supreme Court. So far, the high court has ruled on a procedural issue, but not weighed in on the legality of Trump's order.
− Elections Supreme Court gives Trump an interim win on his mail voting order, but hurdles loom In that earlier procedural ruling, the Supreme Court halted a similar June ruling from Talwani that applied only to the 23 mainly Democratic-led states, plus Washington, D.C., that sued over the order.
+ So far, the Supreme Court ruled on a procedural issue related to Trump's order, but it has not weighed in on the legality.
Elections Supreme Court gives Trump an interim win on his mail voting order, but hurdles loom In that earlier procedural ruling, the high court halted a similar June ruling from Talwani that applied only to the 23 mainly Democrat-led states, plus Washington, D.C., that sued over the order.
− The high court concluded Talwani weighed in too early, before USPS issued a finalized plan for carrying out Trump's directives.
+ The court concluded Talwani weighed in too early, before USPS issued a finalized plan for carrying out Trump's directives.